[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53DAD5B0.3070500@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:48:00 -0700
From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...gle.com>,
"Srivatsa S . Bhat" <srivatsa@....edu>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on
hotplug/suspend
On 07/31/2014 02:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, July 24, 2014 06:07:26 PM Saravana Kannan wrote:
>> This patch simplifies a lot of the hotplug/suspend code by not
>> adding/removing/moving the policy/sysfs/kobj during hotplug and just leaves
>> the cpufreq directory and policy in place irrespective of whether the CPUs
>> are ONLINE/OFFLINE.
>
> I'm still quite unsure how this is going to work with the real CPU hot-remove
> that makes the entire sysfs cpu directories go away. Can you please explain
> that?
Sure. Not a problem. I just wanted to make sure you had a chance to look
at the code first.
Physical hot-remove triggers a "remove" for all the registered
subsys_interfaces for that CPU (after going through a couple of
functions). So, when that happens, the cpufreq subsys_interface remove
for that CPU gets called. At that point, I clean up that CPU's SW states
as if it was never plugged in from the start. If that CPU was the owner
of the sysfs directory, I move it over to a different CPU.
-Saravana
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists