lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140801072950.GF19379@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Fri, 1 Aug 2014 09:29:50 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
Cc:	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org,
	jhladky@...hat.com, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [sched/numa] a43455a1d57: +94.1%
 proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults_local

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 09:03:22PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> 
> Instead of removing info, why not document what each piece of data
> represents. Or add headers to the table. etc.

Yes headers are good, knowing exactly what a number is often removes a
lot of confusion ;-)

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ