[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140801072950.GF19379@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 09:29:50 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org,
jhladky@...hat.com, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [sched/numa] a43455a1d57: +94.1%
proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults_local
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 09:03:22PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>
> Instead of removing info, why not document what each piece of data
> represents. Or add headers to the table. etc.
Yes headers are good, knowing exactly what a number is often removes a
lot of confusion ;-)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists