linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: visorchipset: fix sparse warnings about static declaration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140801081537.GA920@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 1 Aug 2014 01:15:37 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Vincent Bernat <vincent@...nat.im>
Cc:	Benjamin Romer <benjamin.romer@...sys.com>,
	David Kershner <david.kershner@...sys.com>,
	sparmaintainer@...sys.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: visorchipset: fix sparse warnings about static
 declaration

On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:10:22AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Some functions were prototyped as static but the actual definition
> wasn't. While this is valid (the function is static because the two
> declarations don't conflict and the first one is static), this makes
> sparse unhappy and cause confusion of normal people too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Bernat <vincent@...nat.im>
> ---
>  .../unisys/visorchipset/visorchipset_main.c        | 22 +++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

This no longer applies cleanly to my tree, can you please refresh it and
resend so that I can apply it?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/