[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53DB4EC3.3050205@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 16:24:35 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>, Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>,
Zhang Yang <yang.z.zhang@...el.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: nVMX: fix acknowledge interrupt on exit when
APICv is in use
Please ignore this duplicate one.
于 14-8-1 下午4:13, Wanpeng Li 写道:
> After commit 77b0f5d (KVM: nVMX: Ack and write vector info to intr_info
> if L1 asks us to), "Acknowledge interrupt on exit" behavior can be
> emulated. To do so, KVM will ask the APIC for the interrupt vector if
> during a nested vmexit if VM_EXIT_ACK_INTR_ON_EXIT is set. With APICv,
> kvm_get_apic_interrupt would return -1 and give the following WARNING:
>
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff81493563>] dump_stack+0x49/0x5e
> [<ffffffff8103f0eb>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7c/0x96
> [<ffffffffa059709a>] ? nested_vmx_vmexit+0xa4/0x233 [kvm_intel]
> [<ffffffff8103f11a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x17
> [<ffffffffa059709a>] nested_vmx_vmexit+0xa4/0x233 [kvm_intel]
> [<ffffffffa0594295>] ? nested_vmx_exit_handled+0x6a/0x39e [kvm_intel]
> [<ffffffffa0537931>] ? kvm_apic_has_interrupt+0x80/0xd5 [kvm]
> [<ffffffffa05972ec>] vmx_check_nested_events+0xc3/0xd3 [kvm_intel]
> [<ffffffffa051ebe9>] inject_pending_event+0xd0/0x16e [kvm]
> [<ffffffffa051efa0>] vcpu_enter_guest+0x319/0x704 [kvm]
>
> If enabling APIC-v, all interrupts to L1 are delivered through APIC-v.
> But when L2 is running, external interrupt will casue L1 vmexit with
> reason external interrupt. Then L1 will pick up the interrupt through
> vmcs12. when L1 ack the interrupt, since the APIC-v is enabled when
> L1 is running, so APIC-v hardware still will do vEOI updating. The problem
> is that the interrupt is delivered not through APIC-v hardware, this means
> SVI/RVI/vPPR are not setting, but hardware required them when doing vEOI
> updating. The solution is that, when L1 tried to pick up the interrupt
> from vmcs12, then hypervisor will help to update the SVI/RVI/vPPR to make
> sure the following vEOI updating and vPPR updating corrently.
>
> Also, since interrupt is delivered through vmcs12, so APIC-v hardware will
> not cleare vIRR and hypervisor need to clear it before L1 running.
>
> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Suggested-by: "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 3855103..06942b9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -534,6 +534,24 @@ static void apic_set_tpr(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u32 tpr)
> apic_update_ppr(apic);
> }
>
> +int kvm_lapic_ack_apicv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> + int vec;
> +
> + vec = kvm_apic_has_interrupt(vcpu);
> +
> + if (vec == -1)
> + return vec;
> +
> + apic_set_vector(vec, apic->regs + APIC_ISR);
> + apic_update_ppr(apic);
> + apic_clear_vector(vec, apic->regs + APIC_IRR);
> +
> + return vec;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_lapic_ack_apicv);
> +
> int kvm_apic_match_physical_addr(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u16 dest)
> {
> return dest == 0xff || kvm_apic_id(apic) == dest;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> index 6a11845..ead1392 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> @@ -169,5 +169,6 @@ static inline bool kvm_apic_has_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> }
>
> bool kvm_apic_pending_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector);
> +int kvm_lapic_ack_apicv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index b8122b3..c604f3c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -8766,6 +8766,16 @@ static void nested_vmx_vmexit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 exit_reason,
> if ((exit_reason == EXIT_REASON_EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT)
> && nested_exit_intr_ack_set(vcpu)) {
> int irq = kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(vcpu);
> +
> + if (irq < 0 && kvm_apic_vid_enabled(vcpu->kvm)) {
> + irq = kvm_lapic_ack_apicv(vcpu);
> + if (irq >= 0) {
> + vmx_hwapic_isr_update(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> + /* try to update RVI */
> + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
> + }
> + }
> +
> WARN_ON(irq < 0);
> vmcs12->vm_exit_intr_info = irq |
> INTR_INFO_VALID_MASK | INTR_TYPE_EXT_INTR;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists