[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140801083318.GA4907@mwanda>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 11:33:18 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
autofs@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS: allow ->d_manage() to declare -EISDIR in rcu_walk
mode.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 04:08:33PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> @@ -1110,11 +1110,16 @@ static bool __follow_mount_rcu(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *path,
> * Don't forget we might have a non-mountpoint managed dentry
> * that wants to block transit.
> */
> - if (unlikely(managed_dentry_might_block(path->dentry)))
> + switch (managed_dentry_rcu(path->dentry)) {
> + case -ECHILD:
> + default:
> return false;
> + case -EISDIR:
> + return true;
> + }
>
Smatch says that any lines after that switch statement are unreachable.
Is the "default" intended?
> if (!d_mountpoint(path->dentry))
> - return true;
> + return !(path->dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_NEED_AUTOMOUNT);
>
> mounted = __lookup_mnt(path->mnt, path->dentry);
> if (!mounted)
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists