lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <173a5240-a4c6-4611-bc03-95d16080fdb5@email.android.com>
Date:	Fri, 01 Aug 2014 11:47:28 +0100
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	josh@...htriplett.org, challa@...ronetworks.com,
	walpole@...pdx.edu, dev@...nvswitch.org, tklauser@...tanz.ch,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] nftables: Convert nft_hash to use generic rhashtable

On 1. August 2014 11:39:01 GMT+01:00, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> wrote:
>On 08/01/14 at 11:17am, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> On 1. August 2014 09:52:00 GMT+01:00, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
>wrote:
>> >If the set size is known in advance, the table is sized accordingly,
>> >otherwise the table size will default to 64. This is a slight change
>> >in behaviour as previously the default was 4 which eventually
>required
>> >many expansion iterations.
>> 
>> That's assuming a sufficient number of entries will be added. I think
>there
>> will be many cases in nftables where the number will be lower. Since
>> expansion is not very expansive this number was chosen very
>deliberately
>> and I'd prefer to keep it.
>> 
>> Other than that:
>> 
>> Acked-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
>
>OK, I will change the nft_hash default size back to 4.

Thanks.

>I think the expansion is more expensive than it looks though as we
>are potentially calling synchronize_rcu() multiple times while
>holding a mutex to protect from concurrent mutations.

True. On average it should only be a single grace period though IIRC.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ