[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140801112356.GP9030@lee--X1>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:23:56 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Courtney Cavin <courtney.cavin@...ymobile.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>,
Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mfd: pm8xxx-spmi: add support for Qualcomm SPMI
PMICs
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> On 07/31/2014 11:48 AM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> > On 07/30/2014 12:54 AM, David Collins wrote:
> >> On 07/24/2014 05:45 AM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> >>> From: Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>
> >>>
> >>> The Qualcomm SPMI PMIC chips are components used with the
> >>> Snapdragon 800 series SoC family. This driver exists
> >>> largely as a glue mfd component, it exists to be an owner
> >>> of an SPMI regmap for children devices described in
> >>> device tree.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>
> >>> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 16 +++++++++++
> >>> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 +
> >>> drivers/mfd/pm8xxx-spmi.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>
> >> Would it be possible to rename this driver: qcom-spmi-pmic.c? The driver
> >> will be supporting several PMICs that do not fit the pm8xxx naming scheme.
> >> One of which is even specified in the compatible list of this driver
> >> (pma8084). There is presently downstream support for the following PMICs:
> >> PM8019, PM8110, PM8226, PM8841, PM8916, PM8941, PM8994, PMA8084, PMD9635,
> >> PMI8962, and PMI8994 [1]. Four of these do not fit the "PM8XXX" template.
> >
> > I haven't strong opinion on the file names. The qcom prefix is the one
> > which annoying me. If you look at /drivers/mfd the company name prefixes
> > are very few.
> >
> > The *compatible* strings are the important thing here. So If MFD
> > maintainer is fine with this name I'm fine too.
>
> Lee, are you OK with suggested names qcom-spmi-pmic and qcom-ssbi-pmic?
Sounds fine to me.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists