[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53DB8CEA.9010902@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 16:49:46 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>, nsekhar@...com,
robh+dt@...nel.org
CC: devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com,
linux@....linux.org.uk, pawel.moll@....com,
khilman@...prootsystems.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: DTS: da850-evm: Add node for tlv320aic3106 codec
Hello.
On 01-08-2014 9:22, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>> The board uses aic3106 for audio.
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts
>>> index 09118c72e83f..b9ef2be0b145 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts
>>> @@ -51,6 +51,20 @@
>>> tps: tps@48 {
>>> reg = <0x48>;
>>> };
>>> + tlv320aic3106: tlv320aic3106@1b {
[...]
>> Also, the ePAPR standard [1] says:
>> The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function of the
>> device and not its precise programming model.
> True. This is why the node for the audio support is named as 'sound'. For the
> components, like in this case I do not see issue to call the audio codec with
> it's name.
I do. We should follow the standard consistently. Why not call the node
"sound-codec"?
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists