linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC V8 1/1] clk: Support for clock parents and rates assigned from device tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140801161557.GA3277@katana>
Date:	Fri, 1 Aug 2014 18:15:57 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Cc:	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, broonie@...nel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, pawel.moll@....com,
	mark.rutland@....com, galak@...eaurora.org,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
	m.szyprowski@...sung.com, t.figa@...sung.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC V8 1/1] clk: Support for clock parents and rates
 assigned from device tree

On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 02:42:31PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2014-07-03 10:25:53)
> > On 18/06/14 17:29, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > > This patch adds helper functions to configure clock parents and rates
> > > as specified through 'assigned-clock-parents', 'assigned-clock-rates'
> > > DT properties for a clock provider or clock consumer device.
> > > The helpers are now being called by the bus code for the platform, I2C
> > > and SPI busses, before the driver probing and also in the clock core
> > > after registration of a clock provider.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
> > > Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
> > 
> > Could someone please take a look and review that patch ?
> > Any further suggestions, ACKs/NAKs ?
> 
> Patch looks good to me. I'm happy to take it.
> 
> > 
> > I would appreciate a DT, SPI or the I2C maintainer opinions.
> 
> Yes, Acks from SPI and I2C maintainers would be good. I might need to
> drop those parts of this patch if they don't come through :-(

For the I2C part:

Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)