linux-kernel - Re: [REVIEW][PATCH 0/4] /proc/thread-self

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1406860795.3036.3.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jul 2014 19:39:55 -0700
From:	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REVIEW][PATCH 0/4] /proc/thread-self

On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 17:30 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> This is small chance changing /proc/net and /proc/mounts will cause
> userspace regressions (although nothing has shown up in my testing) if
> that happens we can just point the change that moves them from
> /proc/self/... to /proc/thread-self/...

Isn't breaking userspace a no no, no matter what? At least some
util-linux programs makes use of both /proc/mounts and /proc/net.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/