[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140801182656.GJ30458@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 19:26:56 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ks.giri@...sung.com, arnd@...db.de, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
mark.rutland@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
courtney.cavin@...ymobile.com, mporter@...aro.org,
slapdau@...oo.com.au, lftan.linux@...il.com, loic.pallardy@...com,
s-anna@...com, ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org, bjorn@...o.se,
patches@...aro.org, mollie.wu@...aro.org,
t.takinishi@...fujitsu.com, khilman@...aro.org,
lee.jones@...aro.org, andy.green@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv10 0/4] Common Mailbox Framework
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 05:59:54PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
> Hello,
> Here's v10. Not much different from v9. The code and the generic
> bindings looked good enough to relevant gods, but the patchset still
> needs some formal loving in the form of Acked-by's.
>
> Changes since v9:
> o Purely cosmetic changes - added headers and used BIT()
Given that this code is now getting very stable can I suggest setting up
a git tree and making sure it's included in -next? Just send Stephen a
mail with a pointer to the relevant tree and branch and ask him to add it.
I'd say it's probably worth merging at this point though since it's not
been in -next yet and the merge window is likely to open this weekend it
might be a bit much to try to merge it this window.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists