[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1406926000.16021.6.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 13:46:40 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
To: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org
Subject: Re: [LKP] [sched/numa] a43455a1d57: +94.1%
proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults_local
On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 18:16 +0200, Jirka Hladky wrote:
> Peter, I'm seeing regressions for
>
> SINGLE SPECjbb instance for number of warehouses being the same as total
> number of cores in the box.
>
> Example: 4 NUMA node box, each CPU has 6 cores => biggest regression is
> for 24 warehouses.
By looking at your graph, that's around a 10% difference.
So I'm not seeing anywhere near as bad a regression on a 80-core box.
Testing single with 80 warehouses, I get:
tip/master baseline:
677476.36 bops
705826.70 bops
704870.87 bops
681741.20 bops
707014.59 bops
Avg: 695385.94 bops
tip/master + patch (NUMA_SCALE/8 variant):
698242.66 bops
693873.18 bops
707852.28 bops
691785.96 bops
747206.03 bopsthis
Avg: 707792.022 bops
So both these are pretty similar, however, when reverting, on avg we
increase the amount of bops a mere ~4%:
tip/master + reverted:
778416.02 bops
702602.62 bops
712557.32 bops
713982.90 bops
783300.36 bops
Avg: 738171.84 bops
Are there perhaps any special specjbb options you are using?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists