[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140801231929.GB26491@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 01:19:31 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct
pt_regs"
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 04:48:17PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>
> /* 0(%rsp): ~(interrupt number) */
> .macro interrupt func
> - /* reserve pt_regs for scratch regs and rbp */
> - subq $ORIG_RAX-RBP, %rsp
> - CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET ORIG_RAX-RBP
> - cld
> - /* start from rbp in pt_regs and jump over */
> - movq_cfi rdi, (RDI-RBP)
> - movq_cfi rsi, (RSI-RBP)
> - movq_cfi rdx, (RDX-RBP)
> - movq_cfi rcx, (RCX-RBP)
> - movq_cfi rax, (RAX-RBP)
> - movq_cfi r8, (R8-RBP)
> - movq_cfi r9, (R9-RBP)
> - movq_cfi r10, (R10-RBP)
> - movq_cfi r11, (R11-RBP)
> -
> - /* Save rbp so that we can unwind from get_irq_regs() */
> - movq_cfi rbp, 0
Hmm SAVEE_C_REGS below doesn't seem to save rbp like we did before.
Perhaps it's implicitely saved somewhere?
> -
> - /* Save previous stack value */
> - movq %rsp, %rsi
Also rsp isn't saved in %rsi like before. Maybe
that's because we already save it in rdi? Makes sense since
now arg1 == rsp. More on that later.
> -
> - leaq -RBP(%rsp),%rdi /* arg1 for handler */
> - testl $3, CS-RBP(%rsi)
> + ALLOC_PTREGS_ON_STACK
> + SAVE_C_REGS
> + movq %rsp, %rdi /* arg1 for handler */
> + testl $3, CS(%rsp)
> je 1f
> SWAPGS
> - /*
> +1: /*
> * irq_count is used to check if a CPU is already on an interrupt stack
> * or not. While this is essentially redundant with preempt_count it is
> * a little cheaper to use a separate counter in the PDA (short of
> * moving irq_enter into assembly, which would be too much work)
> */
> -1: incl PER_CPU_VAR(irq_count)
> + incl PER_CPU_VAR(irq_count)
> cmovzq PER_CPU_VAR(irq_stack_ptr),%rsp
> - CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rsi
> + CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rdi
>
> /* Store previous stack value */
> - pushq %rsi
> + pushq %rdi
So you push rdi instead...
> CFI_ESCAPE 0x0f /* DW_CFA_def_cfa_expression */, 6, \
> 0x77 /* DW_OP_breg7 */, 0, \
> 0x06 /* DW_OP_deref */, \
> - 0x08 /* DW_OP_const1u */, SS+8-RBP, \
> + 0x08 /* DW_OP_const1u */, SS+8, \
> 0x22 /* DW_OP_plus */
> /* We entered an interrupt context - irqs are off: */
> TRACE_IRQS_OFF
> -
> call \func
> .endm
>
> @@ -749,10 +719,9 @@ ret_from_intr:
>
> /* Restore saved previous stack */
> popq %rsi
And then you pop to rsi. Ok that indeed works but perhaps we should keep it symetrical
just for clarity? Any reason why we can't reuse rdi here?
> - CFI_DEF_CFA rsi,SS+8-RBP /* reg/off reset after def_cfa_expr */
> - leaq ARGOFFSET-RBP(%rsi), %rsp
> + CFI_DEF_CFA rsi,SS+8 /* reg/off reset after def_cfa_expr */
> + movq %rsi, %rsp
> CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rsp
> - CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET RBP-ARGOFFSET
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists