[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53DB210B.5010204@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 08:09:31 +0300
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
<nsekhar@...com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <pawel.moll@....com>,
<khilman@...prootsystems.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: DTS: da850: Add node for edma0
On 07/31/2014 05:26 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 07/31/2014 02:18 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
>> Add DT node for edma0.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>> index b695548dbb4e..41ce4e8bf227 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>> @@ -150,6 +150,12 @@
>> };
>>
>> };
>> + edma0: edma@...00000 {
>> + compatible = "ti,edma3";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x10000>;
>
> Why the mismatch between the unit-address part of the node name and the
> "reg" property?
For some reason the whole da850 uses offset from 0x01c00000 for the SoC IPs.
The nodes are under 'soc' and that has the ranges attribute.
I do not really like this either.
>
>> + interrupts = <11 13 12>;
>> + #dma-cells = <1>;
>> + };
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
--
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists