[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140802042643.GM19379@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 06:26:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@...hat.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org
Subject: Re: [LKP] [sched/numa] a43455a1d57: +94.1%
proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults_local
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 11:30:34PM +0200, Jirka Hladky wrote:
> I see the regression only on this box. It has 4 "Ivy Bridge-EX" Xeon E7-4890
> v2 CPUs.
That's the exact CPU I've got in the 4 node machine I did the tests on.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists