[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140802112130.GA3193@himangi-Dell>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 16:51:30 +0530
From: Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@...il.com>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: julia.lawall@...6.fr
Subject: [PATCH] net: wireless: wl1251: Remove unnecessary free_irq
This patch does away with free_irq in the remove function as the irq is
allocated with a devm_request_irq.
Signed-off-by: Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@...il.com>
---
I'm not sure that devm_request_irq should be used in
the first place, as it will move the stopping of the interrupt over
wl1251_free_hw. Should I use request_irq?
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/spi.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/spi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/spi.c
index a0aa8fa..735be53 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/spi.c
@@ -345,7 +345,6 @@ static int wl1251_spi_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
{
struct wl1251 *wl = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
- free_irq(wl->irq, wl);
wl1251_free_hw(wl);
regulator_disable(wl->vio);
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists