linux-kernel - [PATCH] cpufreq: integrator: Use set_cpus_allowed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140803101539.GA7978@himangi-Dell>
Date:	Sun, 3 Aug 2014 15:45:40 +0530
From:	Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@...il.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: integrator: Use set_cpus_allowed_ptr

Several years ago there was an effort to convert all uses of
set_cpus_allowed to use set_cpus_allowed_ptr with the goal of eventually
removing the current definition of set_cpus_allowed and renaming
set_cpus_allowed_ptr as set_cpus_allowed
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/26/59). This is another step in this
direction.

The Coccinelle semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

// <smpl>
@@
expression E1,E2;
@@

- set_cpus_allowed(E1, cpumask_of_cpu(E2))
+ set_cpus_allowed_ptr(E1, cpumask_of(E2))

@@
expression E;
identifier I;
@@

- set_cpus_allowed(E, I)
+ set_cpus_allowed_ptr(E, &I)
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@...il.com>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c
index e5122f1..c132052 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int integrator_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	 * Bind to the specified CPU.  When this call returns,
 	 * we should be running on the right CPU.
 	 */
-	set_cpus_allowed(current, cpumask_of_cpu(cpu));
+	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(cpu));
 	BUG_ON(cpu != smp_processor_id());
 
 	/* get current setting */
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static int integrator_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	freqs.new = icst_hz(&cclk_params, vco) / 1000;
 
 	if (freqs.old == freqs.new) {
-		set_cpus_allowed(current, cpus_allowed);
+		set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpus_allowed);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static int integrator_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	/*
 	 * Restore the CPUs allowed mask.
 	 */
-	set_cpus_allowed(current, cpus_allowed);
+	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpus_allowed);
 
 	cpufreq_freq_transition_end(policy, &freqs, 0);
 
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static unsigned int integrator_get(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	cpus_allowed = current->cpus_allowed;
 
-	set_cpus_allowed(current, cpumask_of_cpu(cpu));
+	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(cpu));
 	BUG_ON(cpu != smp_processor_id());
 
 	/* detect memory etc. */
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static unsigned int integrator_get(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	current_freq = icst_hz(&cclk_params, vco) / 1000; /* current freq */
 
-	set_cpus_allowed(current, cpus_allowed);
+	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpus_allowed);
 
 	return current_freq;
 }
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/