[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53DF29A8.1030604@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:35:20 +0300
From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>
CC: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: Implement memory-controller clock
I'm curious why you used emc_mux as the parent clock? (I don't really
understand why this clock exists, and my EMC series removes it). Using
'emc' would be compatible with the EMC series :)
A minor one: the MC clock should probably be always enabled.
Apart from these:
Reviewed-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
Tested-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
Cheers,
Mikko
On 01/08/14 15:09, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
>
> The memory controller clock runs either at half or the same frequency as
> the EMC clock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> ...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists