linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140804213059.32fd25d5@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Mon, 4 Aug 2014 21:30:59 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

Hi Christoph,

On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 04:11:47 -0700 Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 04:32:01PM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 05:20 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > I've pushed out updates to both the core-for-3.17 and drivers-for-3.17
> > > branches.
> > 
> > So I'm afraid we missed the last -next build on these, so they can't go
> > in with the early SCSI pull.  I'm open to doing one mid merge window,
> > but Linus tends not to like that.

You realise that neither of these in linux-next as the scsi-core and
scsi-drivers trees had for-3.16 branches in the last round.  I assume I
should just drop these trees completely from linux-next?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)