[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53DF81C3.7050302@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 14:51:15 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>, Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>,
Zhang Yang <yang.z.zhang@...el.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: nVMX: fix acknowledge interrupt on exit when
APICv is in use
Il 01/08/2014 10:12, Wanpeng Li ha scritto:
> +int kvm_lapic_ack_apicv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> + int vec;
> +
> + vec = kvm_apic_has_interrupt(vcpu);
> +
> + if (vec == -1)
> + return vec;
> +
> + apic_set_vector(vec, apic->regs + APIC_ISR);
> + apic_update_ppr(apic);
> + apic_clear_vector(vec, apic->regs + APIC_IRR);
> +
> + return vec;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_lapic_ack_apicv);
I would prefer reusing kvm_get_apic_interrupt here (by modifying
kvm_cpu_get_interrupt, apic_set_isr and apic_clear_irr) as I had
sketched in the previous version of the patches.
There is no reason for kvm_cpu_get_interrupt to return -1 if virtual
interrupt delivery is enabled.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists