[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1407159342.16152.63.camel@joe-AO725>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 06:35:42 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Dotan Barak <dotanb@...lanox.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: checkpatch.pl report about "Missing blank line after
declarations" in a structure definition
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 11:20 +0000, Dotan Barak wrote:
> Hi Joe.
>
> Thanks for fixing the issue that I reported about.
>
> It seems that even after your fix, there is still a false warning of "Missing blank line after declarations".
>
> I executed checkpatch.pl on a header file that exists in the Linux tree:
> # ./checkpatch.pl --file --no-tree ../include/linux/mlx5/cq.h
>
> And got the following warning:
>
> WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
> #49: FILE: ../include/linux/mlx5/cq.h:49:
> + int irqn;
> + void (*comp) (struct mlx5_core_cq *);
[]
> As you can see, this is a structure definition and IMHO the warning above is false.
The version in Linus' tree has a defect where
this test doesn't recognize function pointer
declarations.
This is fixed in -next since June, but it takes
awhile to get into Linus' tree.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/6/426
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists