[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK1hOcOwD0cpVWZEV8FP40y9149feUdaxoszQC+wWQfAwU4MNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 16:28:03 +0200
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct pt_regs"
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com> wrote:
>> 64-bit code was using six stack slots fewer by not saving/restoring
>> registers which a callee-preserved according to C ABI,
>> and not allocating space for them
>
> This is great.
>
> Next up: remove FIXUP/RESTORE_TOP_OF_STACK? :) Maybe I'll give that a shot.
I'm yet at the stage "what that stuff does anyway?" and at
"why do we need percpu old_rsp thingy?" in particular.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists