[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53DF9B58.8000403@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:40:24 +0200
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>
To: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
airlied@...ux.ie
CC: thellstrom@...are.com, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
bskeggs@...hat.com, alexander.deucher@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/19] drm/radeon: handle lockup in delayed work, v2
op 04-08-14 16:37, Christian König schreef:
>> It'a pain to deal with gpu reset.
>
> Yeah, well that's nothing new.
>
>> I've now tried other solutions but that would mean reverting to the old style during gpu lockup recovery, and only running the delayed work when !lockup.
>> But this meant that the timeout was useless to add. I think the cleanest is keeping the v2 patch, because potentially any waiting code can be called during lockup recovery.
>
> The lockup code itself should never call any waiting code and V2 doesn't seem to handle a couple of cases correctly either.
>
> How about moving the fence waiting out of the reset code?
What cases did I miss then?
I'm curious how you want to move the fence waiting out of reset, when there are so many places that could potentially wait, like radeon_ib_get can call radeon_sa_bo_new which can do a wait, or radeon_ring_alloc that can wait on radeon_fence_wait_next, etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists