[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1407170912.877006260@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 17:48:32 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Lv Zheng" <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
"Steffen Weber" <steffen.weber@...il.com>,
"Arthur Chen" <axchen@...dia.com>,
"Barton Xu" <tank.xuhan@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 35/94] ACPI / EC: Remove duplicated ec_wait_ibf0() waiter
3.2.62-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
commit 9b80f0f73ae1583c22325ede341c74195847618c upstream.
After we've added the first command byte write into advance_transaction(),
the IBF=0 waiter is duplicated with the command completion waiter
implemented in the ec_poll() because:
If IBF=1 blocked the first command byte write invoked in the task
context ec_poll(), it would be kicked off upon IBF=0 interrupt or timed
out and retried again in the task context.
Remove this seperate and duplicate IBF=0 waiter. By doing so we can
reduce the overall number of times to access the EC_SC(R) status
register.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70891
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63931
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59911
Reported-and-tested-by: Gareth Williams <gareth@...ethwilliams.me.uk>
Reported-and-tested-by: Hans de Goede <jwrdegoede@...oraproject.org>
Reported-by: Barton Xu <tank.xuhan@...il.com>
Tested-by: Steffen Weber <steffen.weber@...il.com>
Tested-by: Arthur Chen <axchen@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
drivers/acpi/ec.c | 27 +--------------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 26 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -288,23 +288,6 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(
return ret;
}
-static int ec_check_ibf0(struct acpi_ec *ec)
-{
- u8 status = acpi_ec_read_status(ec);
- return (status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF) == 0;
-}
-
-static int ec_wait_ibf0(struct acpi_ec *ec)
-{
- unsigned long delay = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(ec_delay);
- /* interrupt wait manually if GPE mode is not active */
- while (time_before(jiffies, delay))
- if (wait_event_timeout(ec->wait, ec_check_ibf0(ec),
- msecs_to_jiffies(1)))
- return 0;
- return -ETIME;
-}
-
static int acpi_ec_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec, struct transaction *t)
{
int status;
@@ -325,12 +308,6 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction(struct ac
goto unlock;
}
}
- if (ec_wait_ibf0(ec)) {
- pr_err(PREFIX "input buffer is not empty, "
- "aborting transaction\n");
- status = -ETIME;
- goto end;
- }
pr_debug(PREFIX "transaction start (cmd=0x%02x, addr=0x%02x)\n",
t->command, t->wdata ? t->wdata[0] : 0);
/* disable GPE during transaction if storm is detected */
@@ -354,7 +331,6 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction(struct ac
set_bit(EC_FLAGS_GPE_STORM, &ec->flags);
}
pr_debug(PREFIX "transaction end\n");
-end:
if (ec->global_lock)
acpi_release_global_lock(glk);
unlock:
@@ -670,8 +646,7 @@ static u32 acpi_ec_gpe_handler(acpi_hand
spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->curr_lock, flags);
advance_transaction(ec);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->curr_lock, flags);
- if (ec_transaction_completed(ec) &&
- (acpi_ec_read_status(ec) & ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF) == 0) {
+ if (ec_transaction_completed(ec)) {
wake_up(&ec->wait);
ec_check_sci(ec, acpi_ec_read_status(ec));
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists