lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 19:18:14 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH?] x86: reimplement ___preempt_schedule*() using THUNK
helpers
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 07:05:19PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Hmm. This part looks fine, but with or without this patch this all is
> suboptimal, we do not need SAVE_ALL unless I missed something. Can't we
> simply kill preempt.S ?
>
> Peter, what do you think?
HPA right, not me? I'm never sure on these details, if hpa thinks its
fine, I'm good.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists