[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A2CA0424C0A6F04399FB9E1CD98E0304844C4028@US01WEMBX2.internal.synopsys.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 19:07:53 +0000
From: Paul Zimmerman <Paul.Zimmerman@...opsys.com>
To: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"Nyman, Mathias" <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
Subject: RE: Kernel Debugging Support
> From: linux-usb-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-usb-owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Sarah Sharp
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 9:47 AM
>
> Please Cc the new xHCI driver maintainer, Mathias Nyman. I'm officially
> retired from USB development and have moved onto other projects. :)
>
> > After reading around seems people want support for usb debugging in
> > kgdb or other usb based solutions.
>
> Yes, early boot USB debug over xHCI has been a low-priority feature
> request.
>
> Unfortunately, USB debug is an optional feature for xHCI host
> controllers, so many of them don't have USB debug ports. Even if it is
> included, the USB debug ports are often either routed to internal USB
> ports or not exposed on the board altogether. Since it's not widely
> available, it's not a high priority to implement.
Hi Sarah,
Are you sure about that? Last I heard, xHCI debug support was a logo
requirement from Microsoft for Windows 8 and above, so I would have
thought that most vendors would have implemented it by now. I know
Synopsys put a lot of effort into making sure it works in our IP. Or
did Microsoft relax that requirement at the last minute?
--
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists