linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/94] 3.2.62-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1407181779.8341.29.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 04 Aug 2014 20:49:39 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@...il.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/94] 3.2.62-rc1 review

On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 10:55 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 05:48:31PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.62 release.
> > There are 94 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed Aug 06 17:00:00 UTC 2014.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> Build results:
> 	total: 111 pass: 105 fail: 6
> Failed builds:
> 	microblaze:mmu_defconfig
> 	microblaze:nommu_defconfig
> 	mips:allmodconfig
> 	sparc64:allmodconfig
> 	xtensa:defconfig
> 	xtensa:allmodconfig
> 
> Qemu tests all passed.
> 
> This is a significant improvement over the previous versions, where we used
> to see up to 10 build failures. The previously failing builds for unicore32
> and score now pass, as well as alpha:allmodconfig.

Yes, I spent a little while digging out build fixes.

I tried to fix the mips allmodconfig build, but failed - it needs
d3ce88431892, but that depends on 20082595d341, bef9ae3d883c, and
further changes I couldn't identify. 

I was unable to reproduce the sparc64 allmodconfig build failure, which
is in samples/hidraw - it built for me without warnings or errors.
Could you give me a bit more detail about the test setup?

Ben.

> Note that I rearranged arm builds to improve test coverage.
> 
> Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Tomorrow will be cancelled due to lack of interest.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (812 bytes)