linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] v4l2: Change call of function in videobuf2-core.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPM=9tzf2F6fZp6NiKQZm-AESGD5zu3Jf4a6fW_d4HOZ9KvR3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 4 Aug 2014 15:54:38 +1000
From:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
To:	Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
Cc:	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
	Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@...all.nl>,
	Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] v4l2: Change call of function in videobuf2-core.c

>
> Dave,
> I understand your issues with my programming. I need to try and
> understand the kernel first before programming
> for it.

Why do you insist on sending more patches then, every day you try and
send another one or two, despite been
told multiple times to a) understand what you are writing, b) build
test, c) actual test on hw or in a VM if applicable.

Frankly I think you are taking the piss, probably writing some stupid
Uni thesis on how to subvert the kernel development model by trolling
it with broken patches.

Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/