[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140805060856.GA9453@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 08:08:56 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/33] perf record: Allow the user to disable time stamps
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
This patch looks dangerous and misleading to me.
> Time stamps are always implicitely enabled for record currently. The
> old --time/-T option is a nop.
>
> Allow the user to disable timestamps by using --no-time
>
> This can cause some minor misaccounting (by missing mmaps), but
> significantly lowers the size of perf.data
I'm not any big change in size:
-rw------- 1 mingo mingo 384768 Aug 5 08:01 perf.data.timestamps
-rw------- 1 mingo mingo 336952 Aug 5 08:00 perf.data.notimestamps
That's a ~14% reduction - it's certainly noticeable but not
earth-shattering.
And what is called 'minor misaccounting' in the description is
actually a potentially broken profile that people might rely on.
So the patch description misleads twice: by exaggerating the
advantages and also by downplaying the disadvantages.
So either remove the --time option altogether, or fix its
'misaccounting' so that the profile can be relied on.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists