linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] xen-netback: Using a new state bit instead of carrier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140805124545.GD11230@zion.uk.xensource.com>
Date:	Tue, 5 Aug 2014 13:45:45 +0100
From:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
To:	Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
CC:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] xen-netback: Using a new state bit instead
 of carrier

On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 04:20:57PM +0100, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> This patch introduces a new state bit VIF_STATUS_CONNECTED to track whether the
> vif is in a connected state. Using carrier will not work with the next patch
> in this series, which aims to turn the carrier temporarily off if the guest
> doesn't seem to be able to receive packets.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org 
> 
> v2:
> - rename the bitshift type to "enum state_bit_shift" here, not in the next patch
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/common.h b/drivers/net/xen-netback/common.h
> index 28c9822..4a92fc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/common.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/common.h
> @@ -198,6 +198,11 @@ struct xenvif_queue { /* Per-queue data for xenvif */
>  	struct xenvif_stats stats;
>  };
>  
> +enum state_bit_shift {
> +	/* This bit marks that the vif is connected */
> +	VIF_STATUS_CONNECTED

This bit shift applies to vif.  In the following patch you introduce two
more bits specifically for queues. IMHO we should avoid mixing things
up. What about having two enums

  enum vif_state_bit_shift {}
  enum queue_state_bit_shift {}

?

Wei.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/