| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140805132553.GA20291@developer>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 09:25:53 -0400
From: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
To: Anson Huang <b20788@...escale.com>
Cc: rui.zhang@...el.com, shawn.guo@...aro.org, eduardo.valentin@...com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Thermal: imx: add i.mx6sx thermal support
Hello Anson,
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 05:12:43PM +0800, Anson Huang wrote:
> i.MX6SX has some new features of thermal interrupt function,
> there are LOW, HIGH and PANIC irq for thermal sensor, so add
> platform data to separate different thermal version;
>
> The reset value of LOW ALARM is 0 which means the highest
> temp, so the LOW ALARM will be triggered once irq is enabled,
> so we need to correct it before enabling thermal irq;
>
> Enable PANIC ALARM as critical trip point, it will trigger
> system reset via SRC module once PANIC IRQ is triggered, it
> is pure hardware function, so use it instead of software
> reset by cooling device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <b20788@...escale.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/imx-thermal.txt | 2 +-
> drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/imx-thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/imx-thermal.txt
> index 1f0f672..95c05b1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/imx-thermal.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/imx-thermal.txt
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> * Temperature Monitor (TEMPMON) on Freescale i.MX SoCs
>
> Required properties:
> -- compatible : "fsl,imx6q-thermal"
> +- compatible : "fsl,imx6q-tempmon" for V1, "fsl,imx6sx-tempmon" for V2.
It would be kind to document the difference between V1 and V2, don't you
think?
> - fsl,tempmon : phandle pointer to system controller that contains TEMPMON
> control registers, e.g. ANATOP on imx6q.
> - fsl,tempmon-data : phandle pointer to fuse controller that contains TEMPMON
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
> index 2c516f2..2276e74 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -31,6 +32,10 @@
>
> #define MISC0 0x0150
> #define MISC0_REFTOP_SELBIASOFF (1 << 3)
> +#define MISC1 0x0160
> +#define MISC1_IRQ_TEMPHIGH (1 << 29)
> +#define MISC1_IRQ_TEMPLOW (1 << 28)
> +#define MISC1_IRQ_TEMPPANIC (1 << 27)
how about using
+#define MISC1_IRQ_TEMPHIGH BIT(29)
+#define MISC1_IRQ_TEMPLOW BIT(28)
+#define MISC1_IRQ_TEMPPANIC BIT(27)
>
> #define TEMPSENSE0 0x0180
> #define TEMPSENSE0_ALARM_VALUE_SHIFT 20
> @@ -43,6 +48,11 @@
>
> #define TEMPSENSE1 0x0190
> #define TEMPSENSE1_MEASURE_FREQ 0xffff
> +#define TEMPSENSE2 0x0290
> +#define TEMPSENSE2_LOW_VALUE_SHIFT 0
> +#define TEMPSENSE2_LOW_VALUE_MASK 0xfff
> +#define TEMPSENSE2_PANIC_VALUE_SHIFT 16
> +#define TEMPSENSE2_PANIC_VALUE_MASK 0xfff0000
Are the above register offsets and (bit) masks applicable to both
versions? do you mind adding a comment to what is specific to V2?
>
> #define OCOTP_ANA1 0x04e0
>
> @@ -66,6 +76,21 @@ enum imx_thermal_trip {
> #define FACTOR1 15976
> #define FACTOR2 4297157
>
> +#define TEMPMON_V1 1
> +#define TEMPMON_V2 2
> +
where does the V1/V2 nomenclature come from? how about:
+#define TEMPMON_IMX6Q 1
+#define TEMPMON_IMX6SX 2
> +struct thermal_soc_data {
> + u32 version;
> +};
> +
> +static struct thermal_soc_data thermal_imx6q_data = {
> + .version = TEMPMON_V1,
> +};
> +
> +static struct thermal_soc_data thermal_imx6sx_data = {
> + .version = TEMPMON_V2,
> +};
> +
> struct imx_thermal_data {
> struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
> struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
> @@ -79,8 +104,21 @@ struct imx_thermal_data {
> bool irq_enabled;
> int irq;
> struct clk *thermal_clk;
> + const struct thermal_soc_data *socdata;
> };
>
> +static void imx_set_panic_temp(struct imx_thermal_data *data,
> + signed long panic_temp)
> +{
> + struct regmap *map = data->tempmon;
> + int critical_value;
> +
> + critical_value = (data->c2 - panic_temp) / data->c1;
> + regmap_write(map, TEMPSENSE2 + REG_CLR, TEMPSENSE2_PANIC_VALUE_MASK);
> + regmap_write(map, TEMPSENSE2 + REG_SET, critical_value <<
> + TEMPSENSE2_PANIC_VALUE_SHIFT);
> +}
> +
> static void imx_set_alarm_temp(struct imx_thermal_data *data,
> signed long alarm_temp)
> {
> @@ -142,13 +180,15 @@ static int imx_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, unsigned long *temp)
> /* See imx_get_sensor_data() for formula derivation */
> *temp = data->c2 - n_meas * data->c1;
>
> - /* Update alarm value to next higher trip point */
> - if (data->alarm_temp == data->temp_passive && *temp >= data->temp_passive)
> - imx_set_alarm_temp(data, data->temp_critical);
> - if (data->alarm_temp == data->temp_critical && *temp < data->temp_passive) {
> - imx_set_alarm_temp(data, data->temp_passive);
> - dev_dbg(&tz->device, "thermal alarm off: T < %lu\n",
> - data->alarm_temp / 1000);
> + /* Update alarm value to next higher trip point, only V1 needs it */
> + if (data->socdata->version == TEMPMON_V1) {
> + if (data->alarm_temp == data->temp_passive && *temp >= data->temp_passive)
> + imx_set_alarm_temp(data, data->temp_critical);
> + if (data->alarm_temp == data->temp_critical && *temp < data->temp_passive) {
> + imx_set_alarm_temp(data, data->temp_passive);
> + dev_dbg(&tz->device, "thermal alarm off: T < %lu\n",
> + data->alarm_temp / 1000);
> + }
> }
>
> if (*temp != data->last_temp) {
> @@ -398,8 +438,17 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_thermal_alarm_irq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> +static const struct of_device_id of_imx_thermal_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx6q-tempmon", .data = &thermal_imx6q_data, },
> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-tempmon", .data = &thermal_imx6sx_data, },
> + { /* end */ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_imx_thermal_match);
> +
> static int imx_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> + const struct of_device_id *of_id =
> + of_match_device(of_imx_thermal_match, &pdev->dev);
> struct imx_thermal_data *data;
> struct cpumask clip_cpus;
> struct regmap *map;
> @@ -418,6 +467,21 @@ static int imx_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> data->tempmon = map;
>
> + data->socdata = of_id->data;
> +
> + /* make sure the IRQ flag is clear before enable irq */
> + regmap_write(map, MISC1 + REG_CLR, MISC1_IRQ_TEMPHIGH);
Shouldn't this be also done only for TEMPMON_V2? What is the benefit /
effect in doing for V1 ?
> + if (data->socdata->version == TEMPMON_V2) {
> + regmap_write(map, MISC1 + REG_CLR, MISC1_IRQ_TEMPLOW |
> + MISC1_IRQ_TEMPPANIC);
> + /*
> + * reset value of LOW ALARM is incorrect, set it to lowest
> + * value to avoid false trigger of low alarm.
> + */
> + regmap_write(map, TEMPSENSE2 + REG_SET,
> + TEMPSENSE2_LOW_VALUE_MASK);
> + }
> +
> data->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> if (data->irq < 0)
> return data->irq;
> @@ -489,6 +553,10 @@ static int imx_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> measure_freq = DIV_ROUND_UP(32768, 10); /* 10 Hz */
> regmap_write(map, TEMPSENSE1 + REG_SET, measure_freq);
> imx_set_alarm_temp(data, data->temp_passive);
> +
> + if (data->socdata->version == TEMPMON_V2)
> + imx_set_panic_temp(data, data->temp_critical);
> +
> regmap_write(map, TEMPSENSE0 + REG_CLR, TEMPSENSE0_POWER_DOWN);
> regmap_write(map, TEMPSENSE0 + REG_SET, TEMPSENSE0_MEASURE_TEMP);
>
> @@ -550,12 +618,6 @@ static int imx_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
> static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(imx_thermal_pm_ops,
> imx_thermal_suspend, imx_thermal_resume);
>
> -static const struct of_device_id of_imx_thermal_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "fsl,imx6q-tempmon", },
> - { /* end */ }
> -};
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_imx_thermal_match);
> -
> static struct platform_driver imx_thermal = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "imx_thermal",
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists