[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKocOON_RQuKoHTkJKv3iMV5=wszEqGfBGiZ__WW7M902qsf2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 09:45:32 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v6] locking/selftest: Support queued rwlock
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 09:05:53AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> Maybe if tools doesn't sounds right, we could move testing from under tools
>> and have it be testing
>
> No, tools/testing/ is all userspace stuff afaict.
>
>> We have several selftests spread around in the kernel tree. It makes it easier
>> to pull them under a single make target devtest. I sent in a patch add devtest
>> target that runs tests that are under tools/testing/selftests a couple of
>> weeks ago, hopefully it will be included in 3.17. I am working towards pulling
>> more kernel selftests that exist under this devtest umbrella. That is
>> the motivation
>
> A link to the patch might've been useful.. but no that's pointless,
> there is no userspace component to locking-selftest, so your build/run
> target is bloody pointless.
Makes sense. Thanks,
-- Shuah
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists