[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5htx5r53jl.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 18:01:18 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jhautbois@...il.com>
Cc: B_B_Singh@...l.com, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Abhay_Salunke@...l.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
kay@...y.org, ming.lei@...onical.com, Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>,
teg@...m.no, Stuart_Hayes@...l.com, Srinivas_G_Gowda@...l.com,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: patch "firmware loader: allow disabling of udev as firmware loader" added to driver-core tree
At Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:55:40 +0200,
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
>
> 2014-08-05 17:53 GMT+02:00 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>:
> > At Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:43:17 +0200,
> > Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> >>
> >> 2014-08-01 22:01 GMT+02:00 <B_B_Singh@...l.com>:
> >> > Hi Takashi,
> >> >
> >> > Sorry for the late response, I tried with latest stable kernel 3.15.8. surprisingly the BIOS update works even without applying the patch in both the cases.
> >>
> >> Hi,I'm sorry for my late answer too, but I didn't try this patch recently...
> >>
> >> I have a Lattice FPGA on my board, and it seems that your patch breaks
> >> the firmware loading.
> >> I have the following config :
> >> CONFIG_FW_LOADER=y
> >> CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER=n
> >> FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK=n
> >> LATTICE_ECP3_CONFIG=y
> >
> > It worked before applying my patch properly...?
> >
> > The kernel Oops itself is a bug in lattice-ecp3-config driver.
> > It blindly assumes that the returned firmware is non-NULL.
> > firmware_load() must have a NULL check of fw at the beginning.
> >
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Takashi
>
> Yes, it worked, if the firmware was in the /lib/firmware directory.
Then double-check whether it's really my patch who broke.
In your kernel log:
[ 1.188285] lattice-ecp3 spi2.3: Direct firmware load for lattice-ecp3.bit failed with error -2
which indicates that the direct f/w loading from /lib/firmware failed.
Since this code path is called no matter which kernel option is set,
the failure is very unlikely by my patch.
Takashi
> You are right, it lacks a NULL check, I will fix that.
>
> Thanks,
> JM
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists