[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140805161235.GE19379@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 18:12:35 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] irq / PM: Shared IRQs vs IRQF_NO_SUSPEND and
suspend-to-idle wakeup
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 05:22:57PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Here's a patch series based on what we talked about.
>
> [1/5] Mechanism to wake up the system or abort suspend in progress automatically.
> [2/5] Fix for shared IRQs vs IRQF_NO_SUSPEND (with wakeup in mind).
> [3/5] Wakeup interrupts support for suspend-to-idle.
> [4/5] Set IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE for x86 IOAPIC IRQ chips.
> [5/5] Make PCIe PME wake up from suspend to idle.
>
> All tested on MSI Wind that has a couple of issues being addressed.
I can confirm it works on my WSM-EP which has that shared interrupt
stuff.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists