[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140805175802.GE27240@laptop.dumpdata.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 13:58:02 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugfix 0/2] Fix bugs caused by "use irqdomain to dynamically
allocate IRQ for IOAPIC"
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 12:07:18AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
>
>
> On 2014/8/5 21:04, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 11:26:16AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> >> Two issues have been reported against patch set "use irqdomain to
> >> dynamically allocate IRQ for IOAPIC" at https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/9/44.
> >>
> >> This first one causes failure of suspend/hibernation, please refer to
> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/28/822 for more information. And we have
> >> worked out a patch to fix it (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/30/725) and
> >> Borislav has tested it. But with more testing and analysis, I found the
> >> provided patch still has some issues:
> >> 1) It may cause regression to Xen
> >
> > Could you elaborate please?
> >
> > Is there a git tree with all of these patches to test it?
> Hi Konrad,
> The patch at https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/30/725 skips invoking
> xen_pcifront_enable_irq() on resume from suspend or restore from
> hibernation. I'm not sure whether that will affect suspend/hibernation
> with Xen. This patch series won't affect Xen anymore.
Ah, it looks like:
415 pcibios_enable_irq = xen_pcifront_enable_irq;
416 pcibios_disable_irq = NULL;
Is the culprit right? If there was an pcibios_disable_irq set, then said
patch would not been needed?
> I have prepared a tree for you at
> https://github.com/jiangliu/linux.git suspend
Thank you. Will give it a spin tomorrow.
>
> Thanks for help!
> Gerry
>
> >> 2) Flag dev->dev.power.is_prepared has already been cleared when
> >> pcibios_enable_device() gets called, so it will cause IOAPIC pin
> >> reference count leak.
> >>
> >> So I reworked the patch to fix above issues. The first patch fixes issue
> >> 1 by moving check of dev->dev.power.is_prepared pcibios_enable_irq, so
> >> it won't affect Xen. The second patch fixes the IOAPIC pin reference
> >> count leakage issue. It also solves the issue we have discussed at
> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg32902.html
> >>
> >> Regards!
> >> Gerry
> >>
> >> Jiang Liu (2):
> >> x86, irq, PCI: Keep IRQ assignment for PCI devices during
> >> suspend/hibernation
> >> x86, irq: Keep balance of IOAPIC pin reference count
> >>
> >> arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c | 9 ++++++++-
> >> arch/x86/pci/irq.c | 8 +++++++-
> >> drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> >> include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
> >> 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> 1.7.10.4
> >>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists