linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.14 21/39] sched_clock: Avoid corrupting hrtimer tree during suspend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140805181336.685933287@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue,  5 Aug 2014 11:13:58 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3.14 21/39] sched_clock: Avoid corrupting hrtimer tree during suspend

3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>

commit f723aa1817dd8f4fe005aab52ba70c8ab0ef9457 upstream.

During suspend we call sched_clock_poll() to update the epoch and
accumulated time and reprogram the sched_clock_timer to fire
before the next wrap-around time. Unfortunately,
sched_clock_poll() doesn't restart the timer, instead it relies
on the hrtimer layer to do that and during suspend we aren't
calling that function from the hrtimer layer. Instead, we're
reprogramming the expires time while the hrtimer is enqueued,
which can cause the hrtimer tree to be corrupted. Furthermore, we
restart the timer during suspend but we update the epoch during
resume which seems counter-intuitive.

Let's fix this by saving the accumulated state and canceling the
timer during suspend. On resume we can update the epoch and
restart the timer similar to what we would do if we were starting
the clock for the first time.

Fixes: a08ca5d1089d "sched_clock: Use an hrtimer instead of timer"
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1406174630-23458-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/time/sched_clock.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
+++ b/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
@@ -204,7 +204,8 @@ void __init sched_clock_postinit(void)

 static int sched_clock_suspend(void)
 {
-	sched_clock_poll(&sched_clock_timer);
+	update_sched_clock();
+	hrtimer_cancel(&sched_clock_timer);
 	cd.suspended = true;
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -212,6 +213,7 @@ static int sched_clock_suspend(void)
 static void sched_clock_resume(void)
 {
 	cd.epoch_cyc = read_sched_clock();
+	hrtimer_start(&sched_clock_timer, cd.wrap_kt, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
 	cd.suspended = false;
 }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/