| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJAp7OiXW1A-H4io2kST_Y6LdVP+EYkXoU3GaWTRt_+CyXruQA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 13:12:57 -0700 From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se> To: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@...aro.org> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] msm: scm: Move the scm driver to drivers/soc/qcom On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@...aro.org> wrote: > On Mon, 4 Aug 2014, Stephen Boyd wrote: [...] > Could we move scm-boot.c as well to drivers/soc/qcom and scm-boot.h to include/soc/qcom ? Yes, we can do that. But as of now we seem to only have one caller of this wrapper, so maybe we could move the functionality into platsmp.c and drop the file instead? I looked at this a while back and was considering suggesting that we move the scm access behind firmware_ops, but then we should probably also extend the ops struct with all the needed ops related to firmware loading and other things; so I'm not sure if it's a beneficial move. Regards, Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists