[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140805210728.GH13858@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:07:28 -0400
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.15 33/37] Fix gcc-4.9.0 miscompilation of load_balance() in scheduler
Hi -
> >>. I don't disagree it should be
> >> disabled by default, but making it unconditional is going to force the
> >> distributions that care about perf, systemtap, and debuggers to
> >> manually revert this.
> >
> > Bah. I bet I use 'perf' more than most, and it doesn't care about
> > debug info.
Actually, "perf probe" does (via HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT), to place probes
and to extract variables at those probes, much as systemtap does.
Without var-tracking, probes placed at most interior points of
functions will make variables inaccessible.
Do you need a fully worked out example to see this?
- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists