linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] hwmon updates for 3.17

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Aug 2014 15:58:56 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"lm-sensors@...sensors.org" <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] hwmon updates for 3.17

On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>>
>> This branch was rewritten (but not rebased) to add 5 commits at its
>> start and 8 commits at its end since yesterday's linux-next.
>
> Yes, the start because I missed to send a bunch of fixes to Linus last week
> because I was on vacation
> and merged it all together, and the end because I missed to push out a bunch
> of patches for the same
> reason. Everything did pass my test suite, though.
>
> If that is a problem, let me know.

Please, next time, just send me *two* pull requests - one with the
missed fixes, and one with the linux-next work. No point in rewriting
the series so that all the commits are now different from the ones in
linux-next.

I've pulled it, but why rewrite history and mess up the next statistics?

             Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/