[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFz_wx5BVir=WviqwE_ysKMXb1Ka8T7L+Gq2NT9S=yo2_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 16:59:28 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.15 33/37] Fix gcc-4.9.0 miscompilation of load_balance()
in scheduler
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Would you consider a patch that does a gcc COMPARE_DEBUG-based test?
Yes. But as mentioned, we don't have a really good way to do that. I
guess we can do something similar to what "cc-option" does, but that
will end up doing it for every single kernel build. I'd love to have
something like this be done at kconfig time (along with all the
*other* crazy conditional compiler options we do), but I guess that's
a largely independent issue.
And afaik, it will basically disallow every gcc version since 4.5 up
until 4.9.2 gets released. And afaik, even current gcc actually fails
the compare-debug test for at least some inputs, so ...
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists