linux-kernel - linux-next: is the kgdb tree still relevant?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140805140307.3a208980@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 5 Aug 2014 14:03:07 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: linux-next: is the kgdb tree still relevant?

Hi Jason,

I have noticed that the kgdb tree contains 10 commits the last of which
was committed on March 3, 2013.  Should I drop this tree form
linux-next?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)