linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] seq_file: Allow private data to be supplied on seq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Aug 2014 17:02:59 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Rob Jones <rob.jones@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...ts.codethink.co.uk,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, ian.molton@...ethink.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seq_file: Allow private data to be supplied on seq_open

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 06:39:53PM +0100, Rob Jones wrote:

> At the moment these consumers have to obtain the struct seq_file pointer
> (stored by seq_open() in file->private_data) and then store a pointer to
> their own data in the private field of the struct seq_file so that it
> can be accessed by the iterator functions.
> 
> Although this is not a long piece of code it is unneccessary boilerplate.

How many of those do we actually have?

> seq_open() remains in place and its behaviour remains unchanged so no
> existing code should be broken by this patch.

I have no objections against such helper, but I's rather have it
implemented via seq_open() (and as a static inline, not an export),
not the other way round.  Oh, and conversion of at least some users would
be nice to have as well...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/