[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1407345722-61615-3-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:22:02 -0400
From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 2/2] locking/selftest: Support queued rwlock
The queued rwlock does not support the use of recursive read-lock in
the process context. With changes in the lockdep code to check and
disallow recursive read-lock, it is also necessary for the locking
selftest to be updated to change the process context recursive read
locking results from SUCCESS to FAILURE for rwlock.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
---
lib/locking-selftest.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/locking-selftest.c b/lib/locking-selftest.c
index 872a15a..62af709 100644
--- a/lib/locking-selftest.c
+++ b/lib/locking-selftest.c
@@ -267,19 +267,46 @@ GENERATE_TESTCASE(AA_rsem)
#undef E
/*
- * Special-case for read-locking, they are
- * allowed to recurse on the same lock class:
+ * Special-case for read-locking, they are not allowed to
+ * recurse on the same lock class except under interrupt context:
*/
static void rlock_AA1(void)
{
RL(X1);
- RL(X1); // this one should NOT fail
+ RL(X1); // this one should fail
}
static void rlock_AA1B(void)
{
RL(X1);
- RL(X2); // this one should NOT fail
+ RL(X2); // this one should fail
+}
+
+static void rlock_AHA1(void)
+{
+ RL(X1);
+ HARDIRQ_ENTER();
+ RL(X1); // this one should NOT fail
+ HARDIRQ_EXIT();
+}
+
+static void rlock_AHA1B(void)
+{
+ RL(X1);
+ HARDIRQ_ENTER();
+ RL(X2); // this one should NOT fail
+ HARDIRQ_EXIT();
+}
+
+static void rlock_ASAHA1(void)
+{
+ RL(X1);
+ SOFTIRQ_ENTER();
+ RL(X1); // this one should NOT fail
+ HARDIRQ_ENTER();
+ RL(X1); // this one should NOT fail
+ HARDIRQ_EXIT();
+ SOFTIRQ_EXIT();
}
static void rsem_AA1(void)
@@ -1069,7 +1096,7 @@ static inline void print_testname(const char *testname)
print_testname(desc); \
dotest(name##_spin, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_SPIN); \
dotest(name##_wlock, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_RWLOCK); \
- dotest(name##_rlock, SUCCESS, LOCKTYPE_RWLOCK); \
+ dotest(name##_rlock, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_RWLOCK); \
dotest(name##_mutex, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_MUTEX); \
dotest(name##_wsem, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_RWSEM); \
dotest(name##_rsem, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_RWSEM); \
@@ -1830,14 +1857,14 @@ void locking_selftest(void)
printk(" --------------------------------------------------------------------------\n");
print_testname("recursive read-lock");
printk(" |");
- dotest(rlock_AA1, SUCCESS, LOCKTYPE_RWLOCK);
+ dotest(rlock_AA1, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_RWLOCK);
printk(" |");
dotest(rsem_AA1, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_RWSEM);
printk("\n");
print_testname("recursive read-lock #2");
printk(" |");
- dotest(rlock_AA1B, SUCCESS, LOCKTYPE_RWLOCK);
+ dotest(rlock_AA1B, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_RWLOCK);
printk(" |");
dotest(rsem_AA1B, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_RWSEM);
printk("\n");
@@ -1856,6 +1883,21 @@ void locking_selftest(void)
dotest(rsem_AA3, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_RWSEM);
printk("\n");
+ print_testname("recursive rlock with interrupt");
+ printk(" |");
+ dotest(rlock_AHA1, SUCCESS, LOCKTYPE_RWLOCK);
+ printk("\n");
+
+ print_testname("recursive rlock with interrupt #2");
+ printk(" |");
+ dotest(rlock_AHA1B, SUCCESS, LOCKTYPE_RWLOCK);
+ printk("\n");
+
+ print_testname("recursive rlock with interrupt #3");
+ printk(" |");
+ dotest(rlock_ASAHA1, SUCCESS, LOCKTYPE_RWLOCK);
+ printk("\n");
+
printk(" --------------------------------------------------------------------------\n");
/*
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists