[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140806201236.GO17528@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 21:12:36 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Nicolin Chen <Guangyu.Chen@...escale.com>
Cc: Varka Bhadram <varkabhadram@...il.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, timur@...i.org,
Li.Xiubo@...escale.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
galak@...eaurora.org, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
mark.rutland@....com, pawel.moll@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
b42378@...escale.com, b02247@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_sai: Add asynchronous mode support
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 10:42:37AM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 04:44:29PM +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote:
> > Reading comfortably is important for us... :-)
> > see this:http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt#L46
> I know how to write a binding doc with indentations to make it clear.
> What I'm talking about is that the doc was created without indentations,
> so I don't feel comfortable to add indentations starting from this patch
> while leaving the old lines in totally a different style because It's not
> helpful to make people read comfortably at all but only forcing people to
> think why these two lines are so special to take some steps back here.
> So personally I agree with your idea to make doc more readable. But what
> I prefer to do is not having a conversation on the style within this patch
> but to create an extra style-refinement patch later after this one.
This is the right approach.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists