linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq_opp.c: Fixed the __might_sleep by changing GFP_KERNEL to GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1959694.afxgG1N4Rp@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Wed, 06 Aug 2014 22:36:19 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Anand Moon <moon.linux@...oo.com>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq_opp.c: Fixed the __might_sleep by changing GFP_KERNEL to GFP_ATOMIC.

On Wednesday, August 06, 2014 08:02:27 AM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/06, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 6 August 2014 05:05, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> > >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/16/815
> > >>
> > >> @Rafael: Have you already applied patch from above link?
> > >
> > > No, I haven't.  Do we need it after all?
> > 
> > I think yes, Right Stephen? :)
> 
> Yes.

OK, queued up for the next pull request, thanks!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/