[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140807082353.GC2427@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 17:23:53 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@...sung.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>,
t.stanislaws@...sung.com, Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@....com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] mm/page_alloc: fix pcp high, batch management
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 10:11:14AM +0800, Zhang Yanfei wrote:
> Hi Joonsoo,
>
> On 08/06/2014 03:18 PM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > per cpu pages structure, aka pcp, has high and batch values to control
> > how many pages we perform caching. This values could be updated
> > asynchronously and updater should ensure that this doesn't make any
> > problem. For this purpose, pageset_update() is implemented and do some
> > memory synchronization. But, it turns out to be wrong when I implemented
> > new feature using this. There is no corresponding smp_rmb() in read-side
>
> Out of curiosity, what new feature are you implementing?
I mean just zone_pcp_disable() and zone_pcp_enable(). :)
> IIRC, pageset_update() is used to update high and batch which can be changed
> during:
>
> system boot
> sysfs
> memory hot-plug
>
> So it seems to me that the latter two would have the problems you described here.
Yes, I think so. But I'm not sure, because I didn't look at it
in detail. :)
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists