[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r40scy3k.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 21:26:15 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org
Subject: Re: [microcode/load_module] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1444 at kernel/sched/core.c:7094 __might_sleep+0x51/0x16f()
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 05:12:24AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Here is a microcode/load_module error triggered by debug check commit
>> 64c2181bc433b17f04da8fe8592aa83cceac9606 ("sched: Debug nested
>> sleeps"):
Hmm, google lead me to that. Yuck, that's subtle.
> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-xtd4qlahotb7ar4bmo9lapz8@git.kernel.org
> ---
> kernel/module.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/module.c
> +++ b/kernel/module.c
> @@ -3094,6 +3094,28 @@ static int may_init_module(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int wait_finished_loading(struct module *mod)
> +{
Is this something we can generalize? At least needs a comment on
why we don't just use the normal wait_event_interruptible...
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists