[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53E2DD36.8000306@lge.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 10:58:14 +0900
From: Hyogi Gim <hyogi.gim@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver/rtc/class.c: check the error after rtc_read_time()
On 07/24/2014 09:19 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> So what should rtc do in this case? At present it pretends the read
> succeeded. Either way, this doesn't seem to be the place to be making
> such policy decisions..
>
>
>
I agree. But, in this case, RTC device driver can not do anything. And if
rtc_suspend() returns a minus value, then suspend will be aborted. So,
in the worst case, suspend will be failed continually. I think this is not
good.
Most RTC device drivers don't verify the read time value. Even some drivers
just return '0' value(omap, tegra, ...). So, I think the higher level
framework like /drivers/rtc/interface.c should check and handle the rtc
read time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists