[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53E383DD.6090500@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 15:49:17 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@...sung.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>,
t.stanislaws@...sung.com, Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@....com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] mm/isolation: remove unstable check for isolated
page
On 08/06/2014 09:18 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> The check '!PageBuddy(page) && page_count(page) == 0 &&
> migratetype == MIGRATE_ISOLATE' would mean the page on free processing.
What is "the page on free processing"? I thought this test means the
page is on some CPU's pcplist?
> Although it could go into buddy allocator within a short time,
> futher operation such as isolate_freepages_range() in CMA, called after
> test_page_isolated_in_pageblock(), could be failed due to this unstability
By "unstability" you mean the page can be allocated again from the
pcplist instead of being freed to buddy list?
> since it requires that the page is on buddy. I think that removing
> this unstability is good thing.
>
> And, following patch makes isolated freepage has new status matched with
> this condition and this check is the obstacle to that change. So remove
> it.
You could also say that pages from isolated pageblocks can no longer
appear on pcplists after the later patches.
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> ---
> mm/page_isolation.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c
> index d1473b2..3100f98 100644
> --- a/mm/page_isolation.c
> +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c
> @@ -198,11 +198,7 @@ __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
> MIGRATE_ISOLATE);
> }
> pfn += 1 << page_order(page);
> - }
> - else if (page_count(page) == 0 &&
> - get_freepage_migratetype(page) == MIGRATE_ISOLATE)
> - pfn += 1;
> - else if (skip_hwpoisoned_pages && PageHWPoison(page)) {
> + } else if (skip_hwpoisoned_pages && PageHWPoison(page)) {
> /*
> * The HWPoisoned page may be not in buddy
> * system, and page_count() is not 0.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists