[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140807135554.GB27417@ulmo.nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 15:55:55 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...inux.com, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, ajitpal.singh@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] pwm: Introduce ST's PWM driver
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 02:54:32PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Aug 2014, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 01:39:50PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Hi Thierry,
> > >
> > > Did you find some time to look at this set?
> >
> > Sorry for the long delay. I've applied patches 6-11 to the PWM tree,
> > though I've modified patch 6 a little for consistency. The module is
> > now named after the Kconfig option (pwm-sti rather than pwm-st). The
> > dependencies also seem to be redundant (ARCH_STI already depends on
> > OF), though I didn't change that just in case it's required for some
> > other reason.
> >
> > Anyway, scream if there's anything in the PWM for-next branch that
> > needs to be fixed up.
>
> And in time for v3.17. Nice one, thanks Thierry.
Barely...
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists